Juvenile Justice Of Biological And Biosocial Theories

What are the implications for juvenile justice of biological and biosocial theories? Juvenile Justice For countless years researchers have tried to inform the Justice system of the reasons behind some of the delinquencies that have been vetted out on others as a result of the homes in which they are from. It has been difficult to explain however the specific implications as a result of the biological influence such as the genetic makeup of the child. The biological factors as well as the biosocial factor according to some theorists have been proven to influence criminal behaviors in the children. It is therefore as a result that this author, has set out to investigate the implications that biological and biosocial theories have on the juvenile justice system. The Biological and Biosocial theories Implications for Juvenile Justice System Biological and biosocial theories are a combination of theories which suggest that the juvenile is made up both the biological and the social implication of the child’ environment. The fundamentals of this theory emphasis that a child behavior is largely determine by the biological make-up; which is the genetics and the environment in which the child is being influence. A study was done in order to understand the implication for the juvenile justice based upon the biological and biosocial make up of the juvenile. Result presented from Raine et al. Shows that ninety-five delinquents were examined and the record shows that the delinquentsShow MoreRelatedIntroduction: There are many theories that attempt to explain the phenomenon of juvenile1000 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction: There are many theories that attempt to explain the phenomenon of juvenile delinquency and the factors that cause it. There is, and has been, a great amount of young people who engage in delinquent behavior throughout the nation and worldwide. What exactly is the catalyst that incites these young people to commit crime and stray from the ethical norm established in society? Are all youth susceptible to the temptation of deviant behavior or is it just some? Theories suggest different possibleRead MoreTaking a Look at Biological Criminology1240 Words   |  5 PagesBiological criminology began many years ago along with the scientist Cesare Lombroso. He believed that criminals are born, not made. A â€Å"born criminal†, is a â€Å"defective individual†, whom has natural or instinctive tendencies towards low types of social life. (Biosocial and Psychological Theories, Feb. 11, 2014) Biological criminology believes criminals are genetically determined but face major shortco mings for being â€Å"simplistic, untestable, illogical, and often ideological† (Biosocial and PsychologicalRead MoreDeterrence And Rational Choice : The Criminal Justice System And Crime Prevention1196 Words   |  5 PagesI say wiser theory to follow when it comes to the criminal justice system and crime prevention. Using extreme capacitation (Deterrence) can be an effective punishment for many in our society, however, there will still be a small portion of our society that will still commit crimes. The majority of the society would use good-ole common sense (Rational Choice) and not commit crimes in the first place. DISCUSSION: Deterrence and Rational Choice are two theories that our criminal justice system hasRead MoreThe Criminal Justice System And Crime Prevention970 Words   |  4 PagesI say wiser theory to follow when it comes to the criminal justice system and crime prevention. Using extreme capacitation (Deterrence) can be an effective punishment for many in our society, however, there will still be a small portion of our society that will still commit crimes. The majority of the society would use good-ole common sense (Rational Choice) and not commit crimes in the first place. DISCUSSION: Deterrence and Rational Choice are two theories that our criminal justice system haveRead More Getting Behind the Punch: The Knock Out Game Essay1367 Words   |  6 Pagesalong with different criminological theories and finally policies that could be applied for punishment and prevention crime control measures. As mentioned earlier, most cases are not economically motivated which rules out conflict theory since that ideology is associated with perpetrators who believe in class conflict, and using any means to obtain monetary or social power within a divided society. On side note, the trend and cases discussed, Social Learning theory appears to be a universal motivationRead MoreEssay on Criminological Theories13456 Words   |  54 PagesStudent Study Guide for Ronald L. Akers and Christine S. Sellers’ Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Applications Fourth Edition Prepared by Eric See Youngstown State University Roxbury Publishing Company Los Angeles, California 1 Student Study Guide by Eric See for Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application , 4th Edition by Ronald L. Akers and Christine S. Sellers Copyright  © 2004 Roxbury Publishing Company, Los Angeles, CaliforniaRead MoreThe Problem Of Aggression And Violence2205 Words   |  9 Pagesparticular outcome (2001).There are an innumerable amount of studies to explain why aggression and violence occur, which are ranged from social and biosocial explanations as seen by the frustration and aggression theory (Dollard, 1939), the excitement transfer theory (Zillman, 1979), and the social learning theory (Bandura, 1961). Also ranged from biological theories, such as, psychodynamic (Freud, 1920), evolutionary (Buss, 1990), and ethological (Lorenz, 1966). Aggression has many forms, from social, verbal

Kant and Priori Synthetic Truths - 1868 Words

Transcendental aesthetic deals with objects that can be perceived only as far as the mind can perceive it, the mind can only know of those things that we are capable of sensing and feeling. A synthetic judgment is one that connects the concept of B and A, but is not contained within each other. Synthetic truths are those that that are true by virtue of empirical a fact that is to say that its meanings and truths are determined by intuitions which can be representations of something that we hold in our mind. Synthetic a priori truths are necessarily true and underdetermined by sensory impressions, its truths are not determined by truth functional factors alone, and these truths are based on intuition. Synthetic priori knowledge occurs when our mind organizes experiences so that they become necessary and universal facts of our experience, since we don’t experience causation this is how the mind distinguishes between events, it helps us gain knowledge about the world. A priori ju dgments are those that actually exist in the sciences and along with pure a priori judgments in mathematics. A priori knowledge is that which is independent of experience like mathematics. A priori knowledge is known through reason and through an understanding of how something works instead of observing it. Two types of a priori cognition are space and time. This type of cognition is from transcendental aesthetic because it deals with receptivity and how objects can actually be perceived; it is what isShow MoreRelatedThe Supernatural Is Essential In Christianity. â€Å"[A] Supernatural1231 Words   |  5 Pagessupernatural is not explained scientifically, so they simply think that the Bible is a collection of unbelievable supernatural events. However, more significantly, many philosophers and scientists of today deny the word of God because the biblical truth including the supernatural is considered irrational by philosophical or scientific reasons. In spite of their logical reasons, a true reason for their rejection consequently may stem from seeking a new certainty other than God based on the unbeliefRead MoreKants Transcendental Problem: How is Natural Science Possible?1403 Words   |  6 PagesProblem: Kant attempts to answer the question â€Å"How is natural science possible?† (Kant 679R). Natural science in its modern use would simply be called science; it is the systematic body of knowledge that deals with nature. â€Å"Nature is the existence of things insofar as it is determined according to universal laws† (Kant 679R). In understanding nature, â€Å"we are concerned not with things in themselves, but rather with things as objects of possible experience, and the sum of these† (Kant 680L). ThisRead MoreKant And Kant s Metaphysical Theorizing1303 Words   |  6 Pagesmetaphysical theorizing was in large part focused on the matter of how synthetic a-priori judgements were possible. For Kant, the question of how synthetic a-priori judgements operated was central to understanding the nature of human thinking, and to enabling metaphysics. Previously Kant had been alerted to the writings of David Hume. Hume had effectively claimed that knowledge only came from analytic a-priori judgments or by synthetic a-posteriori. Hume criticized the notion of cause and effect, andRead MoreAre There Synthetic A-Priori Propositions? Essay example854 Words   |  4 PagesAre There Synthetic A-Priori Propositions? From a logical point of view, the propositions that express human knowledge can be divided according to two distinctions. First is the distinction between propositions that are a priori, in the sense that they are knowable prior to experience, and those that are a posteriori, in the sense that they are knowable only after experience. Second is the distinction between propositions that are analytic, that is, those in which the predicate is included inRead MoreThe Kantian Revolution: From Metaphysics to Epistemology977 Words   |  4 PagesEpistemology Immanuel Kant is often credited as responsible for the philosophical equivalent of the Copernican Revolution in astronomy. His Copernican Turn introduced the human mind as actively involved in the origination of experience rather than just being a passive recipient of perception. He explains it most thoroughly in the following quote: Up to now it has been assumed that all our cognition must conform to the objects; but all attempts to find out something about them a priori through conceptsRead MoreImmanuel Kant and Moral Law989 Words   |  4 PagesThird Paper: Kant According to Kant, an action can only be morally right when it is motivated by duty alone, as opposed to being motivated by duty and emotion combined or just pure emotion (Kant, Groundwork, 397). In order to defend this statement, I will begin with explaining Kant’s view of morality and what kind of judgments we make in order to discover what morality is and how it relates to the moral law. I will then proceed to explain how Kant defines duty and how it relates to having a goodRead MoreAn Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God1430 Words   |  6 PagesHume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), Hume has the character of Demea present an Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Demea attempts to argue that God’s existence can be proven wholly a priori and logically, rather than through the a posteriori design argument. A priori arguments say that if the reasoning is valid then the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises, which Dem ea argues is the case when it comes to the existence of god. The following essay will discuss DemeaRead MoreEmmanuel Kant and Moral Theory1589 Words   |  6 Pagesbooks message, which also seeks to show the methodology by which individuals derive moral truths and the fundamental nature of these truths. Overall, Kant s philosophical works are still extremely relevant to modern political and philosophical conflicts and his legacy survives in the essential concepts of liberalism, egalitarian ethics, social contract theory, cosmopolitan global justice, and many others. Kant is also considered the founder of the 18th century doctrine of transcendental idealismRead MoreKant s Philosophy Of Philosophy1220 Words   |  5 Pagesfrom the philosophical teachings of David Hume, when Immanuel Kant—Father of Western philosophy—entered the picture. Kant’s â€Å"central question was whether metaphysics—as the science of being itself—objects as they exist fundamentally and independently of our perceptions and interpretations, is possible† (Richards 1). It is said that Kant was sent to rescue philosophy from the hands of Hume. After consulting Hume’s works, however, Kant came to the â€Å"conclusion that metaphysics was not possible, butRead MorePhilosophy: Do We Have Innate Ideas? Essay1491 Words   |  6 Pagesinnate ideas really exist? Descartes does not put experiences to his philosophy like the other philosophers, Bacon and Hobbes. He believes that we have some innate ideas that self, identity, substance and God are in us as we are born â€Å"most part on the truths contained in the mind†. He proposed an observations from the wax. Whatever he heats or cools the wax, it would still remain the same substance. He concludes that the mind is capable of performing â€Å"acts of intellection† in order to know what kind of

Cloning 6 Essay Research Paper CloningIn recent free essay sample

Cloning 6 Essay, Research Paper Cloning In recent old ages the strong argument of human cloning has come into position after the cloning of the sheep Dolly, reasoning over the ethical and unethical issues has been the chief issue. After the cloning of Dolly President Bill Clinton put a five-year prohibition forestalling the usage of any or all-federal support towards human cloning. That does non halt the scientist with his or her ain money and courasity to experiment with human cloning. The unethical issue have played a major portion in this prohibition and every bit good as the sentiments of others. This is the hot subject in biological science, whether it s morally acceptable to clone people, ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) as it should be. The Cloning of worlds is morally unethical and would go against human self-respect. Cloning worlds has many different ethical positions and can be seen is different in everyone s positions. The value of a kid s life can be wholly changed. There will ever be a profound ethical difference between holding a kid and doing a kid. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) A kid begotten is ever seen as a gift, where as if a kid was manufactured or made it would ever be seen as a thing or merely a merchandise. The kid would non be respected for what he/she is, but priced for what it can make, hold or be used for. We re-joice in the God-given mastermind and applications that have materially improved all of our lives. However, non every scientific application of our century has been put to good usage ; some have been put to tragic abuse, even ruinous abuse on a graduated table no anterior century could woolgather of or recognize. Let us reason and hold with the late Paul Ramsey, who clearly stated: The Good things that work forces do can be made complet4e merely by the things they refuse to make. ( Fabricated Man: the moralss of Genetic Control ) Not merely would Cloning go against the self-respect of the human being cloned but what about the ringer itself? The ringer s biological fate will ever be previewed in the parent ; a Situation that would make legion ethical jobs of it s ain. ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) the ringer would see Biologically what happens to you in your parent. As the ringer goes and it will cognize that 40 it will go bald, depressed at 50, and Dead of Stomach Cancer at 60. The ringer nonvoluntary knows a batch more because they are traveling to hold all this biological information push upon them. Therefore if we knew genetically when and what we were traveling to decease of would the ringer be able to acquire insurance, because as it stands we have a bias on people with familial diseases, imagine if we knew the whole biological clock of a individual. In add-on to cognizing genetically what there future is like they with besides fell the torment of populating up to other peoples outlooks, based on the i ndividuality of the individual from which they were cloned. ( Voice of America 26-Mar-98 ) For illustration if Michael Jordan was cloned and at the age of ten old ages old his ringer broke his articulatio genus, would we see him worthless? Or would we set force per unit area on that ringer to go as great of a hoops participants as Micheal originally was. However, the ringer of a figure of different people would non turn out to be like there ringer, to get down cloning today, these ringers would non turn out to be like there ringer, even if the Deoxyribonucleic acid is precisely the same, they like us, were besides shaped by genetic sciences and environment likewise, with the religious capacity to measure, neglect, and at times to get the better of either or both, Each ringer would be capable to a alone set of environment influences. The job with cloning is non the mere fact the engineering is involved. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) Technology neer simply represents human command over nature ; it besides involves the power of some people over other people. ( John F. Killer, Stop Cloning Around 28-April-97. ) This is true in the familial revolution. As it is in the industrial revolution. When human cloning becomes technically possible, who will command who clones whom and for what means? Like atomic arms, the power to clone in the incorrect custodies could hold lay waste toing effects. There is Wisdom in President Clinton s immediate move to prevent human cloning research until the public argument and expert testimony have been digested and policies formulated, But there is even greater wisdom in neer puting pes on a way that leads from weather new sheep to made-to-order organ givers, industrial drones, and amour propre kids. The five-year prohibition set by President Clinton, was an first-class determination but that doesn T halt the in private funded scientist who has the engineering to make whatever they please. Presently there are no national Torahs forbiding the chase of human cloning with private financess. But there are proposals before the U.S. Congress and no fewer than 20 province legislative assemblies that would either prohibition or badly restrict human cloning and related research, irrespective of funding beginning. A lasting prohibition on human cloning is the best solution. As we enter the twenty-first century we look back on the old ages spent in the twentieth century and recognize that we have spent a century seeking to hold sex without babes and now we are seeking to hold babi Es without sex. Cloning In recent old ages the strong argument of human cloning has come into position after the cloning of the sheep Dolly, reasoning over the ethical and unethical issues has been the chief issue. After the cloning of Dolly President Bill Clinton put a five-year prohibition forestalling the usage of any or all-federal support towards human cloning. That does non halt the scientist with his or her ain money and courasity to experiment with human cloning. The unethical issue have played a major portion in this prohibition and every bit good as the sentiments of others. This is the hot subject in biological science, whether it s morally acceptable to clone people, ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) as it should be. The Cloning of worlds is morally unethical and would go against human self-respect. Cloning worlds has many different ethical positions and can be seen is different in everyone s positions. The value of a kid s life can be wholly changed. There will ever be a profound ethical difference between holding a kid and doing a kid. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) A kid begotten is ever seen as a gift, where as if a kid was manufactured or made it would ever be seen as a thing or merely a merchandise. The kid would non be respected for what he/she is, but priced for what it can make, hold or be used for. We re-joice in the God-given mastermind and applications that have materially improved all of our lives. However, non every scientific application of our century has been put to good usage ; some have been put to tragic abuse, even ruinous abuse on a graduated table no anterior century could woolgather of or recognize. Let us reason and hold with the late Paul Ramsey, who clearly stated: The Good things that work forces do can be made complet4e merely by the things they refuse to make. ( Fabricated Man: the moralss of Genetic Control ) Not merely would Cloning go against the self-respect of the human being cloned but what about the ringer itself? The ringer s biological fate will ever be previewed in the parent ; a Situation that would make legion ethical jobs of it s ain. ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) the ringer would see Biologically what happens to you in your parent. As the ringer goes and it will cognize that 40 it will go bald, depressed at 50, and Dead of Stomach Cancer at 60. The ringer nonvoluntary knows a batch more because they are traveling to hold all this biological information push upon them. Therefore if we knew genetically when and what we were traveling to decease of would the ringer be able to acquire insurance, because as it stands we have a bias on people with familial diseases, imagine if we knew the whole biological clock of a individual. In add-on to cognizing genetically what there future is like they with besides fell the torment of populating up to other peoples outlooks, based on the i ndividuality of the individual from which they were cloned. ( Voice of America 26-Mar-98 ) For illustration if Michael Jordan was cloned and at the age of ten old ages old his ringer broke his articulatio genus, would we see him worthless? Or would we set force per unit area on that ringer to go as great of a hoops participants as Micheal originally was. However, the ringer of a figure of different people would non turn out to be like there ringer, to get down cloning today, these ringers would non turn out to be like there ringer, even if the Deoxyribonucleic acid is precisely the same, they like us, were besides shaped by genetic sciences and environment likewise, with the religious capacity to measure, neglect, and at times to get the better of either or both, Each ringer would be capable to a alone set of environment influences. The job with cloning is non the mere fact the engineering is involved. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) Technology neer simply represents human command over nature ; it besides involves the power of some people over other people. ( John F. Killer, Stop Cloning Around 28-April-97. ) This is true in the familial revolution. As it is in the industrial revolution. When human cloning becomes technically possible, who will command who clones whom and for what means? Like atomic arms, the power to clone in the incorrect custodies could hold lay waste toing effects. There is Wisdom in President Clinton s immediate move to prevent human cloning research until the public argument and expert testimony have been digested and policies formulated, But there is even greater wisdom in neer puting pes on a way that leads from weather new sheep to made-to-order organ givers, industrial drones, and amour propre kids. The five-year prohibition set by President Clinton, was an first-class determination but that doesn T halt the in private funded scientist who has the engineering to make whatever they please. Presently there are no national Torahs forbiding the chase of human cloning with private financess. But there are proposals before the U.S. Congress and no fewer than 20 province legislative assemblies that would either prohibition or badly restrict human cloning and related research, irrespective of funding beginning. A lasting prohibition on human cloning is the best solution. As we enter the twenty-first century we look back on the old ages spent in the twentieth century and recognize that we have spent a century seeking to hold sex without babes and now we are seeking to hold babes without sex.